lowrider103
Member
On mine at 2500rpm 107ft/lbs of torque in first.
SE 204 vs SE 255
- Thread starter Fatboy 07
- Start date
On mine at 2500rpm 107ft/lbs of torque in first.
I finally have gotten on my new bike a little since it has 700 miles on it now. I have the 255 cams with V&H Propipe HO, V&H VO2 air cleaner and PCV. If I am rolling along in 1st gear above 2200 RPM and punch it, the things actually will lift the front tire several inches off the ground. The 255's really seem to come on strong. My bike will literally eat up my wife's stock CVO UC with the 110" motor. I am very impressed with the performance.
iclick
Member
I'll second the option of installing SE255's and believe it is an ideal bolt-in cam for a bagger with a stock TC96. I think the 204's will harm the low-end by comparison yet will extend the curve further than the 255's, undoubtedly producing higher peak-HP numbers.
OTOH if you want the power where most of us with touring bikes ride, from 2000-5000 rpm, the SE255's are likely the best cam choice available. Other cams will out-perform it above 3500 rpm, but up to that engine speed you have a real torque monster. The 255's really transformed by bike and I'm very happy with them. DIY and you can do the upgrade for <$300. Here's a write-up I did on my cam job.
OTOH if you want the power where most of us with touring bikes ride, from 2000-5000 rpm, the SE255's are likely the best cam choice available. Other cams will out-perform it above 3500 rpm, but up to that engine speed you have a real torque monster. The 255's really transformed by bike and I'm very happy with them. DIY and you can do the upgrade for <$300. Here's a write-up I did on my cam job.