The news agency that is referenced did a "sensationalism" blurb on a different story. The story I read in another publication explained in detail that there was a dispute between the Owner/sculptor of the statue who had a signed document stating that he LOANED the art to the STEALERSHIP. The HD dealer filed for bankruptcy, reorganized and claimed the art as an asset, then sold the company. The Artist just came and STOLE what was his. The new owners of course think it's thiers, because it was in the inventory. So, no bad on the sculptor, or the new owners, who are fighting in court. Bad on the former stealership, Bad on the yellow journalism,