![]() |
![]() |
 
|
|
Hello Guest, Welcome to the HDTalking, registration is completely FREE and takes only a few seconds. By registering you'll gain: Full Posting Privileges, Access to Private Messaging, Optional Email Notification, Upload Photos, Upload Videos, Respond to Polls, Ability to Fully Participate. To register now click here! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please submit ticket to our helpdesk team. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Why no XL883 in 2009?Sportster Models |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Contributor$
Ride: 2008 Road King Classic.
Join Date: Jun 8th, 2008
Location: Wayne , MI
Posts: 707
My Mood:
![]() |
Re: Why no XL883 in 2009?
usually because the model didnt sell as well as the others
__________________
"Tell me where I'm going, let my bones fall in the Dust, can't you hear that Ghost thats Calling as my Colt begins to Rust, in the Dust" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Warming The Wheels
Ride: 2008 Buell XB12S
Join Date: May 31st, 2008
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 83
![]() |
Re: Why no XL883 in 2009?
hmmm... that stinks cause I selected the standard version when I bought mine. Reason I bought this one was because I felt the most comfortable\natural on it given it has a very upright position, much like a dirtbike, which made me feel much more in control for handling potential tight spots in traffic and such. The L or C was wayyy too leaned back... tougher to handle for me.
I can see why the other version outsell it given the L or C are more cruiser~ish in design but... as I said... thats what I dig about the standard.. it is unique, more upright\aggressive looking for a cruiser type machine. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|