Harley Davidson Forums

USMCCWO5 · May 29th, 2009, 12:10 AM

Here is the stock heads that I have on my bike. Ported and polished, etc.... 103 ci piston.

Not to mislead, I think the bigger bore kit is a great thing, I love the horsepower, just when asked about bang for the buck. Whatever, they will print more money.....

Street Bagger · Jun 8th, 2009, 03:26 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by jims87flh View Post

Head work as in new heads, or as in machining the heads?
I'm only getting about 25 MPG now, seems a bit light, I expected at least 30, although I do tend to drive faster than traffic, and jack rabbit start a lot cause I love the sound of my motor/exhaust. Suggestions?

I got the bike all finished up, WOW, what a butt load of torque this thing makes. I put the SE 255 cams in with the 103 flat tops. I had one of the techs at the Harley Dealer close to me, help remap everything. On my break in ride to OK( around 350 miles that day) I checked my milage on a 130 mile stint and got 49.6 MPG.

I love the HP and the way it runs. Good luck to every one else working on there stuff. I had a blast

Michael

glenreeder · Nov 1st, 2009, 10:40 PM

I just ordered the stage 2 103 kit for my 09 SG. The dealer quoted me $1,500.00, I already have Stage 1 w/ Rineharts. I didn't think the price was anything to get too excited about but the dealer acts like it is a screaming hot deal. I am a little concerned because my dealeer does not have an in house dyno. Can a good mechanic get this upgrade to perform properly w/out a dyno?

glenreeder · Nov 1st, 2009, 11:15 PM

Yes, I have the SE fueler. How much difference in a canned map as compared to a dyno tune?
I'd like to say how much I enjoy and use this site, great info and feed back. How can one donate $$ to the cause?

Neilwillo · Nov 2nd, 2009, 02:20 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post

mine is being killed by the EPA 255cams and SERT as we could not get it to run at the correct AFR was running in the 11 and 12's ie rich and at 100% throttle was 10.3 !!!!!! wasting fuel, we tried the VE tables the AFR the Bias and nothing seemed to affect it, if we could get better cylinder fill i would have a 120+tq monster but the cams does not have enough lift to get the air
but its still running 91hp and 111tq in comparison a 96 stg1 was over 30ft/lbs down and 20hp down and the 103 STG2 2008 bob did with a PCIII and no heads was 10hp and 20ftlbs down on the same dyno and the biggest shock the a destroyer Vrod was down on Torque but obliterated all commers on the HP stages 145hp and still climbing but it ran out of RPMS

Hobbit,
I was thinking about doing the same swap and I'm intrigued by your experiences. Previously you have proposed that the way to go was the HD 103 kit. I was in full agreement with you till I read your post above. I always knew the SE255 cams were EPA compliant but I figured they would be a good cam to give me a lot of torque with or without the 103 kit.

If the 255 cams are not the best what would you suggest? Some people put 211s in 96ci and others put the 203 cams for torque. Seems everyone has their own stories, likes and dislikes. You, on the other hand support your views with figures.

I'm after torque and early in the rev range. I want more roll on when passing cars or touring loaded on the 09 FLHT.

Thank you

Neil

~~Drumrguy~~ · Nov 2nd, 2009, 06:17 PM

I don't care what anybody says but in my honest opinion if you are doing extensive motor work, they only way to get a good tune and all the power you can out of that motor it has to go on the dyno.

jdaws · Nov 2nd, 2009, 07:35 PM

If we are going to build an engine up to 90+ hp, should we be geting the crankshaft trued, welded and better bearings installed? Or at what point do we do this? I would hate to spend 2k or more on power upgrades and see the low end give out.

glens · Nov 2nd, 2009, 07:54 PM

There are two SE "stroker" cranks which have the same stroke as that of the stock 96" engine. One is the crank which is used stock in the 96" and it's built from cast wheels. The other, very more expensive one, has forged wheels. It's the cast wheels which have a harder time holding onto the crankpin.

I don't believe the current cast-wheeled crank is any different than anything that's been put into the 96" (A) engines all along.

bigcletus · Nov 6th, 2009, 07:24 PM

I have an 07 RG. I've put V&H True Duals, a Fuel Pak, Ness Big Sucker on it. I'm thinking of getting the engine upgraded to either a 103 or 110. What would the parts required? How much $$ would I be looking at for the parts??
And would I still use the above add-ons that I have now ??
Thanks

Neilwillo · Nov 19th, 2009, 09:51 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post

Neil
remember my Dyna is a lot lighter than the tourers and that i have done head work as well to increase compression - this is were the 255 cam struggles, i really need a more agressive cam profile to open the valves further and longer.
if you fit the 103 with the stock heads and 255 cam you will see 90hp and around 100ft/lbs on the dyno and trust me when i say you will feel this, the roll on will be perfect and instead of dropping down a cog you will just wind it open specially as the 09's have a more low end oreinted gear box it will fl, how do i know our dealer has a street glide equiped so and it absoluelty rocks runs out of legs above 5500 rpms but then its a 1 tonne bike and its not made for it.
The spec on the street glide - monster ovals, SE heavy breather, SE 103 kit with 255 cam and se tuner - stock heads and throttle body.

Thanks Hobbit. I don't see the high revs as I like to ride and in NSW if you are 30k over the speed limit they take your licence straight off you and charge you over $1000 for the privelage.

Neil

May 29th, 2009, 12:10 AM	#11
USMCCWO5 Community Star Ride: 2011 Road Glide Ultra Join Date: Jun 5th, 2008 Location: Oceanside, CA Posts: 424 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit Here is the stock heads that I have on my bike. Ported and polished, etc.... 103 ci piston. Not to mislead, I think the bigger bore kit is a great thing, I love the horsepower, just when asked about bang for the buck. Whatever, they will print more money..... Attached Thumbnails __________________ Semper Fidelis, James

Jun 8th, 2009, 03:26 PM	#12
Street Bagger New Family Ride: 2008 Street Glide Join Date: Apr 2nd, 2009 Location: Denton Tx Posts: 3	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit Quote: Originally Posted by jims87flh View Post Head work as in new heads, or as in machining the heads? I'm only getting about 25 MPG now, seems a bit light, I expected at least 30, although I do tend to drive faster than traffic, and jack rabbit start a lot cause I love the sound of my motor/exhaust. Suggestions? I got the bike all finished up, WOW, what a butt load of torque this thing makes. I put the SE 255 cams in with the 103 flat tops. I had one of the techs at the Harley Dealer close to me, help remap everything. On my break in ride to OK( around 350 miles that day) I checked my milage on a 130 mile stint and got 49.6 MPG. I love the HP and the way it runs. Good luck to every one else working on there stuff. I had a blast Michael

Nov 1st, 2009, 10:40 PM	#13
glenreeder Warming The Wheels Ride: 09 Flhx Join Date: Aug 9th, 2009 Location: Logan, UT Posts: 88	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit I just ordered the stage 2 103 kit for my 09 SG. The dealer quoted me $1,500.00, I already have Stage 1 w/ Rineharts. I didn't think the price was anything to get too excited about but the dealer acts like it is a screaming hot deal. I am a little concerned because my dealeer does not have an in house dyno. Can a good mechanic get this upgrade to perform properly w/out a dyno?

Nov 1st, 2009, 11:15 PM	#14
glenreeder Warming The Wheels Ride: 09 Flhx Join Date: Aug 9th, 2009 Location: Logan, UT Posts: 88	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit Yes, I have the SE fueler. How much difference in a canned map as compared to a dyno tune? I'd like to say how much I enjoy and use this site, great info and feed back. How can one donate $$ to the cause?

Nov 2nd, 2009, 02:20 AM	#15
Neilwillo Warming The Wheels Ride: 2009 FLHT Join Date: Aug 11th, 2009 Posts: 82 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit Quote: Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post mine is being killed by the EPA 255cams and SERT as we could not get it to run at the correct AFR was running in the 11 and 12's ie rich and at 100% throttle was 10.3 !!!!!! wasting fuel, we tried the VE tables the AFR the Bias and nothing seemed to affect it, if we could get better cylinder fill i would have a 120+tq monster but the cams does not have enough lift to get the air but its still running 91hp and 111tq in comparison a 96 stg1 was over 30ft/lbs down and 20hp down and the 103 STG2 2008 bob did with a PCIII and no heads was 10hp and 20ftlbs down on the same dyno and the biggest shock the a destroyer Vrod was down on Torque but obliterated all commers on the HP stages 145hp and still climbing but it ran out of RPMS Hobbit, I was thinking about doing the same swap and I'm intrigued by your experiences. Previously you have proposed that the way to go was the HD 103 kit. I was in full agreement with you till I read your post above. I always knew the SE255 cams were EPA compliant but I figured they would be a good cam to give me a lot of torque with or without the 103 kit. If the 255 cams are not the best what would you suggest? Some people put 211s in 96ci and others put the 203 cams for torque. Seems everyone has their own stories, likes and dislikes. You, on the other hand support your views with figures. I'm after torque and early in the rev range. I want more roll on when passing cars or touring loaded on the 09 FLHT. Thank you Neil

Harley Davidson Forums

Membership Benefits

103 Big Bore Kit

Harley Davidson Extreme Modification

Pages

Self Help Tips

Self Help Tips

Resources

Nov 2nd, 2009, 06:17 PM	#16
~~Drumrguy~~ Account Removed Ride: 2005 Ultra Classic Join Date: Oct 17th, 2009 Location: Oakdale, Pa. Posts: 573 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit I don't care what anybody says but in my honest opinion if you are doing extensive motor work, they only way to get a good tune and all the power you can out of that motor it has to go on the dyno.

Nov 2nd, 2009, 07:35 PM	#17
jdaws Play The Throttle Ride: 2008 105 anv. FXDL Join Date: Jan 9th, 2009 Location: NE - MINNESOTA Posts: 150 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit If we are going to build an engine up to 90+ hp, should we be geting the crankshaft trued, welded and better bearings installed? Or at what point do we do this? I would hate to spend 2k or more on power upgrades and see the low end give out.

Nov 2nd, 2009, 07:54 PM	#18
glens Banned Ride: 09FLHTCU Join Date: Oct 6th, 2009 Posts: 96	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit There are two SE "stroker" cranks which have the same stroke as that of the stock 96" engine. One is the crank which is used stock in the 96" and it's built from cast wheels. The other, very more expensive one, has forged wheels. It's the cast wheels which have a harder time holding onto the crankpin. I don't believe the current cast-wheeled crank is any different than anything that's been put into the 96" (A) engines all along.

Nov 6th, 2009, 07:24 PM	#19
bigcletus Warming The Wheels Ride: 2007 Road Glide FLTR Join Date: Jan 6th, 2009 Posts: 148 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit I have an 07 RG. I've put V&H True Duals, a Fuel Pak, Ness Big Sucker on it. I'm thinking of getting the engine upgraded to either a 103 or 110. What would the parts required? How much $$ would I be looking at for the parts?? And would I still use the above add-ons that I have now ?? Thanks

Nov 19th, 2009, 09:51 PM	#20
Neilwillo Warming The Wheels Ride: 2009 FLHT Join Date: Aug 11th, 2009 Posts: 82 My Mood:	Re: 103 Big Bore Kit Quote: Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post Neil remember my Dyna is a lot lighter than the tourers and that i have done head work as well to increase compression - this is were the 255 cam struggles, i really need a more agressive cam profile to open the valves further and longer. if you fit the 103 with the stock heads and 255 cam you will see 90hp and around 100ft/lbs on the dyno and trust me when i say you will feel this, the roll on will be perfect and instead of dropping down a cog you will just wind it open specially as the 09's have a more low end oreinted gear box it will fl, how do i know our dealer has a street glide equiped so and it absoluelty rocks runs out of legs above 5500 rpms but then its a 1 tonne bike and its not made for it. The spec on the street glide - monster ovals, SE heavy breather, SE 103 kit with 255 cam and se tuner - stock heads and throttle body. Thanks Hobbit. I don't see the high revs as I like to ride and in NSW if you are 30k over the speed limit they take your licence straight off you and charge you over $1000 for the privelage. Neil

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Big Bore Kit/ EFI	RDking01	Touring Models	6	Feb 12th, 2011 08:57 AM
103 big bore	mike_h	Harley Davidson Extreme Modification	12	Jan 11th, 2011 07:12 PM
big bore kit	mickx711	Sportster Models	0	Dec 28th, 2010 08:14 PM
Big Bore Kit	xxspark	Softail Models	3	Feb 18th, 2010 10:13 AM
Big bore kit and TFI at last	McQueen1963	Softail Models	1	Feb 12th, 2010 10:14 PM