![]() |
![]() |
 
|
|
Hello Guest, Welcome to the HDTalking, registration is completely FREE and takes only a few seconds. By registering you'll gain: Full Posting Privileges, Access to Private Messaging, Optional Email Notification, Upload Photos, Upload Videos, Respond to Polls, Ability to Fully Participate. To register now click here! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please submit ticket to our helpdesk team. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Tuning for fuel economyEngine, Fuel and Exhaust |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes | |||
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Family
Ride: 2002 Electraglide
Join Date: Jul 1st, 2008
Location: Kerens, TX
Posts: 3
My Mood:
![]() |
Tuning for fuel economy
Looking for some help here. I have a 2002 FLHT, carbed version. The first owner (2 months) put about 2000 miles on it so I don't know how it was broken in. I had a stage 1 done with Bub's big dog pipes, K&N air and rejetting. My 2008 Impala gets better fuel economy. On a recent trip to the Big Bend area of Texas I got 32 mpg. (that was holding the speed to about 75 max on the highway). I am considering "detuning" the bike by putting the original filter, pipes and jet back. Can anyone give me an idea whether this will make much difference? I am not a hotdogger and spend most of my time in the 60 - 70 mph range. My Impala got 33 mpg on a recent trip to San Antonio at 75 mph. Thanks for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Community Liaison
Ride: 07 Road King Classic
Join Date: Jun 21st, 2007
Posts: 11,625
My Mood:
![]() |
Re: Tuning for fuel economy
Best way to tell is to open the carb and check the sizes of the jetting in there. If it is too large or if the needle was substituted for the sportster needle (27094-88 ), that will knock the MPG down considerably.
__________________
Psssst! ![]() Please stop by the "self help section" for maintenance tips, diagnostic codes and much more. click me!>>Self Help Information and Tips<< click me! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Start The Engine
Ride: 2002 FXD
Join Date: Dec 6th, 2007
Posts: 31
![]() |
Re: Tuning for fuel economy
Hi, I drove 142 km trip and my 2002 FXD took 4,24 litres per 100 kilometres. If I calculated correctly it equals to 55 MPG. Speed was about 52 mph. I have V&H Big Shots, Ness Big Sucker Stage 1 and rejetting was done by local dealer. I am sure that higher speeds will make much lower MPG figures. I am very happy about my bikes economy even though my 1.4 liter diesel Skoda is still more economical. Lowest consuption is 3.6 liters per 100 kilometres that is about 60 MPG.
1 gallon 95 fuel costs today 9,12 USD in Finland - I wish we had as cheap as you guys there in US 1 gallon diesel costs 8,22 USD Last edited by Tuukka : Jul 2nd, 2008 at 04:35 PM. Reason: more info |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Play The Throttle
Ride: 99 roadking EFI
Join Date: Dec 13th, 2006
Location: Casa Grande, AZ
Posts: 231
My Mood:
![]() |
Re: Tuning for fuel economy
I get good mileage going to and from work 40 to 45mpg (55mph typically) but if I hit the freeway (75,80,85mph) I can watch the gas gauge drop quickly. twin cam 88 with screaming eagle intake vance and hines longshots with oversized cams
__________________
"I inhale"!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|