Harley Davidson Forums

Loading


Hello

Guest

Welcome to the harley davidson forum. Join our discussion today for FREE!

CREATE ACCOUNT

Membership Benefits

Get your questions answered by harley davidson community gurus and industry experts. Exchange your experience with another members. Access full features forum. Get a members discounts for your harley parts & accessories.

dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Electrical

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 24th, 2011, 07:39 PM     #1
Start The Engine
Ride: 2011 street glide
 
hdfozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 20th, 2011
Posts: 22
hdfozz is an unknown quantity at this point
dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Hey How's everybody doing?I'm looking for any un-biased opinions on the pros and cons of these two types of ignitions for 1998 1340 fxstc.How hard to replace the stock system with single fire ? which brand is the most preferred, Thanks HDFOZZ
hdfozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 24th, 2011, 08:25 PM     #2
Account Removed
Ride: 2009 Dyna Low
 
Join Date: Aug 16th, 2009
Posts: 7,235
Hoople will become famous soon enoughHoople will become famous soon enough
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Quote: Originally Posted by hdfozz View Post
How hard to replace the stock system with single fire ? which brand is the most preferred, Thanks HDFOZZ
I would prefer single fire if I had a choice. Having dual fire means there will be a spark firing on valve overlap (wasted spark) as well as the compression stroke. Normally that is not a problem with most cylinder set-ups. But with Harley's there "can" be a problem if your using long duration cams. Since the Harley has 315 and 405 firing intervals, when the rear cylinder is fired on the compression stroke, the front cylinder is on the exhaust stroke - which is OK. But when the front cylinder is fired on the compression stroke, the rear cylinder is already on the intake stroke. A combustible mixture may exist in the rear cylinder at this point and the wasted spark causes a backfire through the carburetor. This is where the long duration cams can be a problem.

The only issue with converting a dual fire to single is that with single fire you need some way to phase the ignition to the crank. Normally a cam sensor is used for that. I have seen some aftermarket systems (Crane) advertised as phasing during cranking (or starting). During cranking, the ignition sees the engine slow down during compression via the crank sensor. From that slowing-down, the ignition now knows which cylinder is on it's compression stroke. I have never used a Crane myself but I feel that is a very risky way to do it due to the fact if "sync" is lost for some reason, you must restart the engine to re-phase the ignition. Now if you happen to loss sync by an "even" count, you would be OK. But an odd error count (1,3,5,7,etc) would be bad news. Using a cam sensor would be the most reliable way to phase a single fire ignition to a crank.
Hoople is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 24th, 2011, 09:19 PM     #3
Start The Engine
Ride: 2011 street glide
 
hdfozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 20th, 2011
Posts: 22
hdfozz is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Thanks for the info
hdfozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25th, 2011, 08:34 AM     #4
Play The Throttle
Ride: '91 FLTC/FLHR
 
karlsbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 13th, 2010
Location: Norway, Europe, Planet Earth
Posts: 264
karlsbike is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Hoople is absolutely correct in his points about the stock dual fire (or wasted spark). Now he's got a TC, but at least on a carbed Evo the conversion to single fire is easy:

You've got your cam sensor in the nose cone. Under the nose-cone cover and the plate underneath it you've got your stock sensor (pick-up) sitting on the plate right in front of you. Your ignition knows the phase of the engine by sensing when the slot in your rotary cup open/close (hall effect, or magnetic field sensing).

The only practical difference between the two is that a single fire unit needs to know which coil to fire - front or rear, while a dual fire system just fires its single coil at an interval given by the pick-up (adjusted in your ignition unit for the 315/405 deg difference between front and rear).
Depending on the ignition system you're chosing, but with an advanced unit you set which advance curve you want (e.g. by dip switches), and then set static timing in relation to front cylinder TDC (comp stroke) and the cup positon (indicated by a light on the ignition unit). The rest is computed.

So, in practise, what it takes is a bit of simple re-wiring, and finding a place for the two coils required - or you can get a dual coil unit that most probably will fit in the stock poisition. The ignition and pick-up can be had as a fully nose-cone contained unit, meaning that you'll get rid of the separate ignition module as well...
__________________
All the best,
Karl
'91 FLTC/FLHR
karlsbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25th, 2011, 11:37 AM     #5
Contributor
Ride: 2007 Electra Glide Classic
 
Breeze3at's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 18th, 2009
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 4,193
My Mood: My Mood
Breeze3at has a spectacular aura aboutBreeze3at has a spectacular aura about
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Great info in Hoople and Karl's responses. I put a Dynatec HD1 unit on my '92 Dyna Glide back about '94. I can (and have) go from single to dual fire with a flip of a dip switch. Honestly, the only difference I can tell, is the idle is a little more "lumpy" in single fire mode. I'm running a .530" lift, medium duration cam.
__________________
Pete / Breeze .380
_________________________________________
I don't ride fast, but I will ride far.
Breeze3at is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25th, 2011, 02:16 PM     #6
Community Guru
Ride: 2007 Dyna Street Bob
 
R_W_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 14th, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,461
My Mood: My Mood
R_W_B will become famous soon enoughR_W_B will become famous soon enough
Smile Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Quote: Originally Posted by Breeze3at View Post
Great info in Hoople and Karl's responses. I put a Dynatec HD1 unit on my '92 Dyna Glide back about '94. I can (and have) go from single to dual fire with a flip of a dip switch. Honestly, the only difference I can tell, is the idle is a little more "lumpy" in single fire mode. I'm running a .530" lift, medium duration cam.
Hoop had an excellent post as usual, but I have read a lot in this area. As Hoop said if you install a longer duration cam the the intake is going to start opeing sooner.

But all things being OEM most experts and people who have tried it (like Breeze3at) say there is no noticable difference in the performance. One reason for this is that the physics of the ignitable mixture. A compressed mixture conducts a spark better than the uncompressed intake stoke mixture so a larger percentage of the coils input will go to the compressed cylinder. In other words at the upper end of the intake stroke you have a weak spark occurring in the wasted cyclinder.

I tend to like the old potato potato sound of the dual fire more. If you are going to create a performance bike then yes make single fire one of the options. Otherwise if you are just street riding enjoy the sound you are gonna feel the same power either way.
R_W_B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25th, 2011, 02:29 PM     #7
Moderators
Ride: '11 FLSTC (Heritage Softail Classic)
 
TQuentin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4th, 2008
Location: Summerwood in Humble, TX
Posts: 4,307
TQuentin1 is on a distinguished road
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

On my '91 Dyna (carb.) I changed over to the Spyke Single Fire multi-spark system with a higher output coil. The system also suggests removing the VOES from the system (and plugging the vaccum port in the intake manifold).

TQ
__________________

Please stop by the "The Self-Help pages."
>>Self-Help Information and Tips - Harley Davidson Community Self-Help Threads Information<< click me!
TQuentin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25th, 2011, 04:42 PM     #8
Contributor
Ride: 2007 Streetbob
 
Jack Klarich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 25th, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 16,572
My Mood: My Mood
Jack Klarich has a spectacular aura aboutJack Klarich has a spectacular aura about
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Another plus of single fire is you can adjust the rear cylinder timing independent from the front, most good units have built in diagnostics and lights for timing and selectable advance curves
__________________
CAPITAL JACK( Nuff Said, We're Burnin Daylight, Let's Ride)
Jack Klarich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26th, 2011, 04:42 AM     #9
Play The Throttle
Ride: '91 FLTC/FLHR
 
karlsbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 13th, 2010
Location: Norway, Europe, Planet Earth
Posts: 264
karlsbike is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Quote: Originally Posted by TQuentin1 View Post
On my '91 Dyna (carb.) I changed over to the Spyke Single Fire multi-spark system with a higher output coil. The system also suggests removing the VOES from the system (and plugging the vaccum port in the intake manifold).

TQ
I have seen the same, but for the life of me I cannot see any advantages to removing the VOES - except, of course, if the VOES causes pinging. I will try out single fire with VOES


Quote: Originally Posted by Breeze3at View Post
Great info in Hoople and Karl's responses. I put a Dynatec HD1 unit on my '92 Dyna Glide back about '94. I can (and have) go from single to dual fire with a flip of a dip switch. Honestly, the only difference I can tell, is the idle is a little more "lumpy" in single fire mode. I'm running a .530" lift, medium duration cam.
Same here, and I will try it out once the white stuff goes away (word avoided, as courtesy to Jack;). But, I am surprised that you experienced more lumpy idle in single-fire mode - I'd think it would be opposite...
__________________
All the best,
Karl
'91 FLTC/FLHR
karlsbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26th, 2011, 10:14 AM     #10
Contributor
Ride: 2007 Electra Glide Classic
 
Breeze3at's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 18th, 2009
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 4,193
My Mood: My Mood
Breeze3at has a spectacular aura aboutBreeze3at has a spectacular aura about
Re: dual fire vs. single fire ign.

Quote: Originally Posted by karlsbike View Post
I have seen the same, but for the life of me I cannot see any advantages to removing the VOES - except, of course, if the VOES causes pinging. I will try out single fire with VOES
Same here, and I will try it out once the white stuff goes away (word avoided, as courtesy to Jack;). But, I am surprised that you experienced more lumpy idle in single-fire mode - I'd think it would be opposite...
I might have that backwards... It's been so long since I changed it, and I changed the exhaust system at the same time (no balance tube now).
Of course I just took the manifold off yesterday to fix an air leak, so I can't go fire it up and switch it to hear the difference.
__________________
Pete / Breeze .380
_________________________________________
I don't ride fast, but I will ride far.
Breeze3at is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
single fire ignition prjr5 Dyna Models 2 Sep 3rd, 2009 09:10 AM
single fire dhorne Softail Models 11 May 12th, 2009 05:10 AM
Hi-4 single fire ignition glider. Diagnostics and Fuel Injection Related 0 May 5th, 2009 08:54 PM
DualFire or Single Fire Coil e7171 Classic Models 9 Mar 23rd, 2009 03:40 PM
Single Fire and Dual Fire Ignitions Explained glider. Electrical and Lighting Systems 0 Jun 25th, 2007 04:32 PM